Nim : A . 320 090 090
Page 50-51
1. Objectives: The judge (A)
asked to John Smith (B) to make confirmation, to show
compliment.
John Smith expresses complaining to the judge.
Situation :
™ Participant suspect in
lower position than the judge
™ Location in the court
™ Formal situation
Act sequence: first, the suspect coming to the room of the
court. Second the judge opens the session. Last, the judge
gives some question to the suspect.
Key
: anger or irritated
Instrumental :
spoken and formal
Norm
: the suspect has less respect to the judge. He should be
respected to the judge.
Genre
: judicial conversation
2. There are roles for the
marriage principal, ta’aruf, Ijab qobul, ceremony of marriage,
marriage script, closing of marriage ceremony. There are roles for the language
principal; the language within the institution ‘research’ must meet different
requirements (such as precision) than language in education
(comprehensibility). Both language and marriage has system of role in
utterances.
3. The similarity between
the institution concept as it is used in section5.2 and the meaning of the word
‘institution’ in the Institutia Oratoria by Quintilian and Calvin’s
Religionis Christianae Institution is Participant, there is member of
group, the existence of role.
5. Phatic communion in
this conversation there are two passengers of the bus and they are talking
about the payment. They only talk to spend of time, there is, no intention to
discuss more about the payment.
8. Objectives
: The conductor asked to
passenger to make confirmation, he also complains to the passenger that holds up
a lit cigarette.
Situation
: Location in the train and informal situation
Effect
: The conductor attempts to ask the passenger about what the passenger
will be doing. But, the
passenger feels irritated.
No comments:
Post a Comment